🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."