🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.